Why should I choose AnalystNotes?
AnalystNotes specializes in helping candidates pass. Period.
Basic Question 24 of 24
On January 1, 2011, Microbrew Corporation had a cumulative net loss in its pension plan (the expected return on plan assets was less than the actual return). During 2011, the plan experienced an additional net loss and, at year-end, the cumulative net loss was within the 10% corridor. How is the plan's economic status affected by 2011 net loss?
B. The projected benefit obligation is decreased.
C. The projected benefit obligation is increased.
A. Pension expense is increased.
B. The projected benefit obligation is decreased.
C. The projected benefit obligation is increased.
User Contributed Comments 10
| User | Comment |
|---|---|
| bmeisner | As long as the net loss is within 10% of the previous year's PBO then there is no amortization of the losses. Once it crosses the 10% threshold then the difference would be amortized over the average remaining employee service life. This would increase pension expense going forward but it caps the change from year to year in the PBO. It makes sense too because since the PBO is a present value of a really far in the future liability it is easily affected by actuarial assumptions and so could be quite volatile. Market returns can also be very volatile, especially for mainly equity portfolios. |
| ilzina | If the net loss is unrecognized, why PBO is increased? Shouldn't PBO be decreased by the expected return? |
| MasterD | ilzina: PBO is decreased by an return, increased by a loss |
| HenryQ | If the loss is small and not amortized, that means it should be recognized as obligation immediately, so the PBO increases. |
| HenryQ | The whole purpose of amortization is just to make sure the pension obligation/asset do not get distorted due to the actuarial changes (as said by bmeisner). Is the change is small, there is not need to amortize so just book them under the right account (obligation/asset). |
| kodali | PBO increases due to interest and service costs which is normal. I guess the question tries to highlight the 10% limit at which the un-realized losses doesn't have to be amortized |
| vi2009 | PBO = a liability ... so if net loss, then PBO increases (i.e. liability increases!) |
| dblueroom | The accumulated loss is recognized in full as reflected in funded status on the B.S. The corridor approach is really about amortiztion, meaning expensing the loss on income statement to prevent this loss getting bigger on the balance sheet. And if this loss exceeds 10% of larger of PBO or FV of plan assets, then we need to start expensing this loss, adding to periodic pension expense. |
| Teeto | Plan funded status shall be affected by reduction in plan assets, not by increase in obligation, isn't it? |
| davidt876 | if the expected return was less than the actual return isn't there a gain? im so f*cked for pensions... |
Thanks again for your wonderful site ... it definitely made the difference.
Craig Baugh
Learning Outcome Statements
explain and calculate measures of a defined benefit pension obligation (i.e., present value of the defined benefit obligation and projected benefit obligation) and net pension liability (or asset);
describe the components of a company's defined benefit pension costs;
explain and calculate the effect of a defined benefit plan's assumptions on the defined benefit obligation and periodic pension cost;
CFA® 2025 Level II Curriculum, Volume 2, Module 11.